Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(36,333 posts)
6. Probably more than has been reported.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:22 PM
Jan 2013

And less than you'd think.

It's hard to tamper with a lot of the scores. You don't get that much time with the answer sheets, if the school has its testing system set up according to the rules. Most of the time the teachers aren't even supposed to see the test questions.

What you *do* get is a lot of funny test prepping just before the tests. You highlight what you know from previous released tests and cram that into a 1-3 week review session. It doesn't show what they've learned. It shows what you shoved into their minds short-term and they haven't managed to forget yet. This isn't learning. This is futzing with short-term memory. It happens mostly with low-achieving schools, and in high achieving schools it happens with low-achieving students.

A key to this is that you use as many of the released test questions as possible. Since they recycle or minimally alter quite a few test questions from year to year, you basically don't teach to the test--you actually teach the test.

A test is supposed to sample the curriculum, not *be* the curriculum.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»‘Frontline’ raises questi...»Reply #6