Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Journeyman

(15,191 posts)
11. I agree. I also thought the structure of the question a bit odd. . .
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 11:01 PM
Sep 2014

Are first graders expected to understand language like that? "Related subtraction sentence" seems a very stilted way to explain anything to a six year old. And yes, there not being a subtraction answer certainly confuses the issue. Look at how much debate it generated amongst a discussion group composed of adults. In a room full of little kids, something like that would generate more blank looks, I suspect, than it would eager participation.

All this said, I have to point out that it appears to be, if anything, a preafrooding failure. As a graphic designer & typographer from way back, I'm offended by such shoddy craftsmanship. Especially when the end user is intended to be little children in a learning environment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»I would never have expect...»Reply #11