Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Is emission-less propulsion possible? I believe it is... [View all]Think. Again.
(19,099 posts)35. It's an interesting concept...
...I have to admit it's a new one to me.
How quickly could it be scaled?
As far as the other technologies I mentioned, yes, they will take an added expenditure of CO2 for a lmited time to pull us away from fossils, but we don't have a choice. The quicker we build out these alternatives, the more we will be displacing the use of fossils, and once we're past the apex we can continue to cut back that usage exponentially until we're safely clear of the forces behind, and sources of, CO2 emissions.
It really does come down to that. We simply must make any and every effort to stop pumping CO2 into the atmosphere if we are going to have any hope of salvaging a somewhat viable planetary ecology, and the very life that ecology supports.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I really hope this is all tongue-in-cheek. If so, that's one for you! Just in case...
NCIndie
Dec 2023
#5
Ok... please read a little farther down the post please... There is no plan for a shotgun based propulsion design...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#7
I'm not an AI robot and your challenge was based on scientific inquiry. I responded in kind...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#11
I think you're missing the point... none of those are useful for extended space travel... or can reach similar speeds
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#4
This isn't about the energy required to run it.. that's still a problem... for a bit... we first have to see....
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#8
I built this idea fighting A for the past year... lol... so thank you I do appreciate skepticism. It built this idea.
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#12
That is precisely why I am here... I have had my ass handed to me so many times on this forum.... LOL
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#14
You're going to build a car with zero carbon footprint because of renewables+nuclear?
NCIndie
Dec 2023
#19
Here, I think, is the fundamental error - whether ChatGPT's or yours, I can't tell from the formatting
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2023
#73
OK, some numbers for position (Python? Why Python? This is a physics problem, not a numerical procedure)
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2023
#81
Can you try to write better, please? Your questions, or messages, are obscured by your style.
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2023
#84
The apparent paradox arises from a simplified view of the situation and is resolved when considering the full complexity
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#33
This part of the argument is where chatgpt is completely botching the physics.
Salviati
Dec 2023
#37
I wouldn't trust ChatGPT to count my toes accurately. It wasn't written to do that.
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2023
#41
"They're trying to move mass with electrons... they need to move mass with mass"
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#55
Not logic. "view count" is not equal to "copy-paste" nor equal to "don't understand the math"
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#62
If you want to be taken seriously, and you clearly do, then don't be childish. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#65