Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

NNadir

(34,779 posts)

1. After pointing out that CCS is silly the article switches to hydrogen fantasies.

Reply to hatrack (Original post)

Thu Aug 29, 2024, 06:54 AM

Aug 2024

It has that great word "could."

Fifty years of "coulds" about hydrogen from so called "renewable energy," another three car Monty game by which the fossil fuel industry pretends to be "green," has nonetheless left us with a burned planet.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

$12 Billion In US Public Funding For "Carbon Capture", Fossil Hydrogen, Other Unproven/Flailing Climate "Solutions" [View all] hatrack Aug 2024 OP

After pointing out that CCS is silly the article switches to hydrogen fantasies. NNadir Aug 2024 #1

Yeah, I've been using a lot more quotation marks in my headlines these days . . . hatrack Aug 2024 #2

In my opinion, there may be a case for CCU... NNadir Aug 2024 #3

If "traditional plastics" were made from oceanic carbon dioxide using nuclear power... hunter Aug 2024 #4

In theory yes, although single use plastics are a huge environmental problem and the quantities are marginal. NNadir Aug 2024 #5