Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
4. How Anti-Obama. How Pro-Fossil Fuel.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:38 AM
Apr 2016

"FACT SHEET: Obama Administration Announces Actions to Ensure that Nuclear Energy Remains a Vibrant Component of the United States’ Clean Energy Strategy

As detailed in the Climate Action Plan, President Obama is committed to using every appropriate tool to combat climate change. Nuclear power, which in 2014 generated about 60 percent of carbon-free electricity in the United States, continues to play a major role in efforts to reduce carbon emissions from the power sector. As America leads the global transition to a low-carbon economy, the continued development of new and advanced nuclear technologies along with support for currently operating nuclear power plants is an important component of our clean energy strategy. Investing in the safe and secure development of nuclear power also helps advance other vital policy objectives in the national interest, such as maintaining economic competitiveness and job creation, as well as enhancing nuclear nonproliferation efforts, nuclear safety and security, and energy security.

The President’s FY 2016 Budget includes more than $900 million for the Department of Energy (DOE) to support the U.S. civilian nuclear energy sector by leading federal research, development, and demonstration efforts in nuclear energy technologies, ranging from power generation, safety, hybrid energy systems, and security technologies, among other things. DOE also supports the deployment of these technologies with $12.5 billion in remaining loan guarantee authority for advanced nuclear projects through Title 17. DOE’s investments in nuclear energy help secure the three strategic objectives that are foundational to our nation’s energy system: energy security, economic competitiveness, and environmental responsibility."

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/11/06/fact-sheet-obama-administration-announces-actions-ensure-nuclear-energy

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Shutting Indian Point, as is the case with shutting any nuclear plant, will kill people. NNadir Apr 2016 #1
+1e6 phantom power Apr 2016 #6
As usual, the conclusion you offer isn't supported by the data. kristopher Apr 2016 #15
As usual... your keyhole-narrow focus has forced you to defend the ridiculous FBaggins Apr 2016 #18
With the Clean Power Plan in effect kristopher Apr 2016 #19
Laughable spin FBaggins Apr 2016 #20
Yes legislation has the power to alter reality. kristopher Apr 2016 #21
There's that active imagination again FBaggins Apr 2016 #22
One possible effect of solar flares and loss of the ultimate heat sink - is multiple Baobab Apr 2016 #2
A High-Pressure Pipeline Next to a Nuclear Power Plant. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Lodestar Apr 2016 #3
The pipeline is nearly 1/4 of a mile away from the nuke plant whitefordmd Apr 2016 #7
When YOU live within a 1/4 mile of this infrastructure I'll give your opinion Lodestar Apr 2016 #8
My opinion is not changed by where I live whitefordmd Apr 2016 #11
How Anti-Obama. How Pro-Fossil Fuel. wtmusic Apr 2016 #4
There are no growing dangers, but nice try. wtmusic Apr 2016 #5
"the nuclear renaissance is real"? Lodestar Apr 2016 #9
Despite the endless nonsense, nuclear energy remains, by far, the world's largest... NNadir Apr 2016 #10
Ha...was wondering when you'd show up. Lodestar Apr 2016 #12
No, being anti-nuke requires you accept fossil fuels, pollution, and climate change. wtmusic Apr 2016 #13
No it doesn't. kristopher Apr 2016 #16
Japan Inches Closer to Nuclear Revival as 3rd Reactor Starts wtmusic Apr 2016 #14
You're right. Sometimes the truth just sucks. Take your slant here... kristopher Apr 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A Fukushima on the Hudson...»Reply #4