Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

15. As usual, the conclusion you offer isn't supported by the data.

Reply to NNadir (Reply #1)

Sun Apr 3, 2016, 11:25 PM

Apr 2016

Given current industry dynamics there is no reason to think that shutting down Indian Point will result in increased emissions of any kind. It's possible, but highly unlikely.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Fukushima on the Hudson?: The Growing Dangers of Indian Point [View all] marmar Apr 2016 OP

Shutting Indian Point, as is the case with shutting any nuclear plant, will kill people. NNadir Apr 2016 #1

+1e6 phantom power Apr 2016 #6

As usual, the conclusion you offer isn't supported by the data. kristopher Apr 2016 #15

As usual... your keyhole-narrow focus has forced you to defend the ridiculous FBaggins Apr 2016 #18

With the Clean Power Plan in effect kristopher Apr 2016 #19

Laughable spin FBaggins Apr 2016 #20

Yes legislation has the power to alter reality. kristopher Apr 2016 #21

There's that active imagination again FBaggins Apr 2016 #22

One possible effect of solar flares and loss of the ultimate heat sink - is multiple Baobab Apr 2016 #2

A High-Pressure Pipeline Next to a Nuclear Power Plant. What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Lodestar Apr 2016 #3

The pipeline is nearly 1/4 of a mile away from the nuke plant whitefordmd Apr 2016 #7

When YOU live within a 1/4 mile of this infrastructure I'll give your opinion Lodestar Apr 2016 #8

My opinion is not changed by where I live whitefordmd Apr 2016 #11

How Anti-Obama. How Pro-Fossil Fuel. wtmusic Apr 2016 #4

There are no growing dangers, but nice try. wtmusic Apr 2016 #5

"the nuclear renaissance is real"? Lodestar Apr 2016 #9

Despite the endless nonsense, nuclear energy remains, by far, the world's largest... NNadir Apr 2016 #10

Ha...was wondering when you'd show up. Lodestar Apr 2016 #12

No, being anti-nuke requires you accept fossil fuels, pollution, and climate change. wtmusic Apr 2016 #13

No it doesn't. kristopher Apr 2016 #16

Japan Inches Closer to Nuclear Revival as 3rd Reactor Starts wtmusic Apr 2016 #14

You're right. Sometimes the truth just sucks. Take your slant here... kristopher Apr 2016 #17