Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Mondoweiss: Are comparisons of South African apartheid and Israel useful? [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 17, 2016, 01:05 PM - Edit history (1)
The only people who defend his rants as not being antisemitic are Jew hating antisemites like the FreeGaza movement or Alison Weir. Now you...
You're the only one with a unique definition of antisemitism. So unique that practically anything goes when ripping into Jews.
I'll remind you again that the EUMC working definition of antisemitism has been accepted by all Western liberal democracies. The only nations opposing them are facist or totalitarian oppressive countries with the worst human rights records against their people. It turns out Jews are people, with human rights. That's why the EUMC definition is accepted as authoritative by the nations that matter.
You can't even agree that when the PA or Hamas incites hate and calls for murdering Jews (not to mention praising the killers and paying them or their families) is antisemitism. It says more about you that you can't call THAT kind of neo-naziism antisemitism. The nazis did that. They called for the mass killing of Jews. They acted on it, just like Hamas & the PA do. They incited genocidal hatred just like the PA and Hamas does daily.
You must think highly of yourself. So highly in fact that only you know how to properly define Anti-Semitism & now Apartheid.
Do you see now why I believe these positions of yours - and those of BDS - are hateful? Definitions and meanings of words are twisted and mangled to such an extent (colonialism included) that they constitute lies. People who deliberately lie on purpose over and over again vs. an ethnicity or race are considered to be bigots who incite hatred with their intentional lies & slander. There is no other reason for the lies other than hatred.