Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Clinton campaign slams ‘outrageous’ UNESCO resolution on Jerusalem [View all]sabbat hunter
(6,893 posts)30. you realize that
the 1949 cease fire lines were just that, cease fire lines?
So by your logic if Israel was in control of Jerusalem in 1949 when the cease fire was declared, it would legally be theirs?
And yes I have been to Jerusalem. I was Bar-Mitzvahed at the wall.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Clinton campaign slams ‘outrageous’ UNESCO resolution on Jerusalem [View all]
King_David
Oct 2016
OP
If you think that holding a Bar mitzvah at the Wall was your religious right
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#31
I think that East Jerusalemites should have their applications made with the same ease as for every
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#37
The annexation of Eastern Jerusalem was was determined to be "null and void" by the United Nations
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#8
The current status quo can't stay forever - peace will eventually break out, one way or the other.
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#45