Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,042 posts)

17. Oh, the magical delayed remote action bombs?

Reply to wildbilln864 (Reply #16)

Sat Oct 31, 2015, 03:39 PM

Oct 2015

So you believe people in or near the buildings heard bombs all over the place, including out in the street, well before the buildings collapsed (and you're sure they were bombs because nothing else sounds like an explosion and nothing else explodes in a fire), and then when the magic was just right, they caused the buildings to collapse up where the planes hit? Is that supposed to be less idiotic than magical silent explosives?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2335! update: 2416, update: 2444! new update: 2613 and growing! [View all] wildbilln864 Mar 2015 OP

Zero! William Seger Mar 2015 #1

you wished! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #3

growing library of peer-reviewed technical papers Jeroen Nov 2015 #26

Sure William Seger Nov 2015 #27

Thanks Jeroen Nov 2015 #28

"no explosives were active during the collapses" William Seger Nov 2015 #29

Classic, controlled demolition Jeroen Nov 2015 #30

I don't have any problem with people who "question the official narrative" William Seger Nov 2015 #31

Numbers are fun! zappaman Mar 2015 #2

? OBenario Oct 2015 #6

now 2354. and climbing. n/t wildbilln864 May 2015 #4

Holy crap! zappaman May 2015 #5

Do you imagine there'ssome significance to the percentage? wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #7

I'm so glad you asked, here's some homework so you might answer your own questions honestly. greyl Oct 2015 #8

wasn't asking you but perhaps you could answer in your own words? wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #9

Wrong, false, and untrue. You did ask, "What do you account for the percentage...yada yada" greyl Oct 2015 #11

2366? Up 12 in the last 6 months? William Seger Oct 2015 #10

up yes. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #12

You ignore attrition. Many former "truthers" have discovered they were lied to William Seger Oct 2015 #13

your post has so many false assertions William. But you know that. n/t wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #14

No, I don't know that, and apparently neither do you William Seger Oct 2015 #18

you assert that no one could have... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #19

24/7!? No... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #15

yep! wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #16

Oh, the magical delayed remote action bombs? William Seger Oct 2015 #17

yeah there you go making up shit again. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #22

Give it up wildbilln864, GGJohn Oct 2015 #20

yea well I'll be here to remind them... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #21

Here? On a chat board? GGJohn Oct 2015 #23

doesn't seem to slow you down any. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #24

Spread the word where ever you go? GGJohn Oct 2015 #25

+1000 nt Logical Nov 2015 #32

C'mon now... zappaman Nov 2015 #33

2,374 n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #34

2409! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #35

Weird argument whitefordmd Dec 2015 #36

not an argument wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #37

So your posting a fact, but not trying to make a point? Very sensible. eom whitefordmd Dec 2015 #38

I actually take some small comfort William Seger Dec 2015 #39

I used to work with a Structural Engineer that was neck deep into all sorts of woo. whitefordmd Dec 2015 #40