Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)

23. Here? On a chat board?

Reply to wildbilln864 (Reply #21)

Sat Oct 31, 2015, 07:43 PM

Oct 2015

Yeah, you're really getting the word out.
Well, it's a free country, feel free to make a fool of yourself.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2335! update: 2416, update: 2444! new update: 2613 and growing! [View all] wildbilln864 Mar 2015 OP

Zero! William Seger Mar 2015 #1

you wished! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #3

growing library of peer-reviewed technical papers Jeroen Nov 2015 #26

Sure William Seger Nov 2015 #27

Thanks Jeroen Nov 2015 #28

"no explosives were active during the collapses" William Seger Nov 2015 #29

Classic, controlled demolition Jeroen Nov 2015 #30

I don't have any problem with people who "question the official narrative" William Seger Nov 2015 #31

Numbers are fun! zappaman Mar 2015 #2

? OBenario Oct 2015 #6

now 2354. and climbing. n/t wildbilln864 May 2015 #4

Holy crap! zappaman May 2015 #5

Do you imagine there'ssome significance to the percentage? wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #7

I'm so glad you asked, here's some homework so you might answer your own questions honestly. greyl Oct 2015 #8

wasn't asking you but perhaps you could answer in your own words? wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #9

Wrong, false, and untrue. You did ask, "What do you account for the percentage...yada yada" greyl Oct 2015 #11

2366? Up 12 in the last 6 months? William Seger Oct 2015 #10

up yes. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #12

You ignore attrition. Many former "truthers" have discovered they were lied to William Seger Oct 2015 #13

your post has so many false assertions William. But you know that. n/t wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #14

No, I don't know that, and apparently neither do you William Seger Oct 2015 #18

you assert that no one could have... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #19

24/7!? No... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #15

yep! wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #16

Oh, the magical delayed remote action bombs? William Seger Oct 2015 #17

yeah there you go making up shit again. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #22

Give it up wildbilln864, GGJohn Oct 2015 #20

yea well I'll be here to remind them... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #21

Here? On a chat board? GGJohn Oct 2015 #23

doesn't seem to slow you down any. wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #24

Spread the word where ever you go? GGJohn Oct 2015 #25

+1000 nt Logical Nov 2015 #32

C'mon now... zappaman Nov 2015 #33

2,374 n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #34

2409! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #35

Weird argument whitefordmd Dec 2015 #36

not an argument wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #37

So your posting a fact, but not trying to make a point? Very sensible. eom whitefordmd Dec 2015 #38

I actually take some small comfort William Seger Dec 2015 #39

I used to work with a Structural Engineer that was neck deep into all sorts of woo. whitefordmd Dec 2015 #40