Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whitefordmd

(102 posts)
8. It would be good to include the entire statement
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 07:39 PM
Jan 2016
The analyses of the video (both the estimation of the instant the roofline began to descend and the calculated velocity and acceleration of a point on the roofline) revealed three distinct stages characterizing the 5.4 seconds of collapse:

Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).
Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)
Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity

This analysis showed that the 40 percent longer descent time—compared to the 3.9 second free fall time—was due primarily to Stage 1, which corresponded to the buckling of the exterior columns in the lower stories of the north face. During Stage 2, the north face descended essentially in free fall, indicating negligible support from the structure below. This is consistent with the structural analysis model, which showed the exterior columns buckling and losing their capacity to support the loads from the structure above. In Stage 3, the acceleration decreased as the upper portion of the north face encountered increased resistance from the collapsed structure and the debris pile below.
Thanks Wildbill that was a good way to start the day whitefordmd Jan 2016 #1
What I believe is... wildbilln864 Jan 2016 #2
The speed at which WTC 1 & 2 fell is completely whitefordmd Jan 2016 #3
well NIST admitted 7's collapse was indeed wildbilln864 Jan 2016 #4
For a short time? whitefordmd Jan 2016 #5
yes 2 point something seconds... wildbilln864 Jan 2016 #6
here: wildbilln864 Jan 2016 #7
It would be good to include the entire statement whitefordmd Jan 2016 #8
the point was to show... wildbilln864 Jan 2016 #9
And the point was to hide WHEN that freefall happened William Seger Feb 2016 #15
again a delusional post from you? wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #16
Uh, nope; I'm talking about all the exterior columns William Seger Feb 2016 #18
doesnt matter what you're talking about... wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #19
Don't you mean no one is falling for you and your CT buddies nonsense anymore? GGJohn Feb 2016 #21
not at all! wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #22
LOL, ok, you just keep on believing that. GGJohn Feb 2016 #23
your own posts prove that's bullshit! wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #25
2262 people have left a review for these off-brand gummy candies greyl Feb 2016 #24
For the Undying 9/11 MORONIC Replies JohnyCanuck Feb 2016 #10
great find, thanks for sharing. n/t wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #11
Cole is a liar and a fraud William Seger Feb 2016 #12
It would have been a miracle if there were no molten steel at the WTC JohnyCanuck Feb 2016 #13
Nope, not even close William Seger Feb 2016 #14
more official conspiracy nonsense from William. Sad. n/t wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #17
You're hardly the one to chatise anyone about conspiracy nonsense. eom. GGJohn Feb 2016 #20
all you ever have is your opinion! wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #26
Steel fails in fire... a concept 9/11 truth CD believers fail to realize. superbeachnut May 2016 #27
but on 911 steel was melted! wildbilln864 May 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»For the undying 9/11 MORO...»Reply #8