The JFK assassination

[Craig234]

26. You need to be more honest in your discussing

Of course one of the theories to consider is that Oswald was telling the truth.

The evidence says he was not. The fact you ask the question doesn't add to the discussion, it's just to insult.

Actually you can find the notes in the Warren Commission, Appendix XI.

http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=946#relPageId=622

Mark Lane has not been an especially honest actor, and that is not an accurate description of the witnesses. The issue of the witnesses and the grassy gnoll shooter theory have been reviewed thoroughly in many books.

Citing James Files is just embarrassing. He is a thoroughly discredited liar. Here's a start, a website dedicated to his lies.

http://jamesfilesfraud.com/

You make a completely false statement about the issue of the clip of Oswald.

If there was more to the assassination, it won't necessarily come out. The only new evidence remaining to be found we know of are the remaining CIA files scheduled for release in October 2017, and obviously you can't expect as assassination plot in them.