Creative Speculation

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)

10. william you actually believe...

Mon Sep 12, 2016, 12:22 AM

Sep 2016

that a small already damaged and lighter section of the tower actually smashed down all the way to the ground the rest of the tower? really?
even though the rest of the tower was undamaged? structuraly sound.
really?
even though it would have to plow through the undamaged remainder? really?
knowing that the building's 47 massive steel core columns and other steel framing increased in size and thickness, therefore was more robust than the above part?
really?
and it even accelerated! really?
you trying to sell that here for a long long time now. Over a decade. haven't convinced anyone but you keep trying.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mainline European Physics journal publishes paper critical of NIST 9/11 report [View all] JohnyCanuck Aug 2016 OP

Unfortunately, it's the same crap AE911truth has been peddling for years William Seger Aug 2016 #1

there are now over 2600 architects and engineers... wildbilln864 Aug 2016 #2

120k architects in the US alone. zappaman Sep 2016 #5

So if controlled demolition was used to bring down the buildings.... JohnyCanuck Sep 2016 #3

LOL, nobody had the means William Seger Sep 2016 #4

still using that same lame assed "silent explosives" strawman eh willi? wildbilln864 Sep 2016 #9

Technical Report on WTC collapses mailed out to 35,000 engineers. JohnyCanuck Sep 2016 #6

Why "constant acceleration" proves that Richard Gage is an idiot William Seger Sep 2016 #7

go ahead and send that wildbilln864 Sep 2016 #8

william you actually believe... wildbilln864 Sep 2016 #10