Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

exboyfil

(18,023 posts)
5. Ridiculous
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 06:48 AM
Apr 2017

In any controlled demolition you hear the sound of the charges going off. Not so in any of the video from 9/11.

The collapses start at the point of impact. We know the jets hit the building. We have video of the first impact (not to mention thousands and thousands of eyewitness reports). We have probably at least 50 videos of the second impact. Both collapses start at the point of impact - where you would have expected the charges to have been most disrupted if they had been placed.

So you wait around for the building to start collapsing at the point of impact and then set off the charges to bring the rest of the building down?

No one observed hundreds of charges being placed in the building?

Scaling is a factor in engineering. His simplified model does not reflect the actual construction of the building.

Listen for the lack of sound of charges going off.




Here is a controlled demolition. The charges are the loudest thing on the video.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WTF? BigOleDummy Apr 2017 #1
All you have are insults? gyroscope Apr 2017 #7
Does it hurt your feelings? n/t OBenario4 Apr 2017 #10
Do you have anything intelligent to say? gyroscope May 2017 #11
Some say that the I85 collapse in Atlanta greymattermom Apr 2017 #2
Surely Companies That Specialize In Controlled Demolition.... global1 Apr 2017 #3
Not a very good model since towers 1, 2, 7 did approximately 2 billion dollars worth of damage to AtheistCrusader Aug 2017 #13
Oh FFS. nt Laffy Kat Apr 2017 #4
Ridiculous exboyfil Apr 2017 #5
Patently false gyroscope Apr 2017 #6
Was it a delayed CD? hack89 Apr 2017 #8
NY Fire Chief: Devices were planted in the buildings. gyroscope Apr 2017 #9
There were lots of erroneous reports that day. PoindexterOglethorpe Jul 2018 #17
What makes you say the reports were erroneous? gyroscope Jul 2018 #18
I was referring specifically to the reports that there were fires on the Mall. PoindexterOglethorpe Jul 2018 #19
As a matter of fact Separation Sep 2018 #20
Even after the second plane crashed on live TV PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2018 #21
This has already been proven, but you have to use concrete blocks and chicken wire snooper2 Jun 2017 #12
Spooked911 is that you? whitefordmd Nov 2017 #14
When you start off with a lie, it is impossible to get to the truth. Theobald Feb 2018 #15
Yes they did gyroscope Feb 2018 #16
Yes it could zipplewrath Sep 2018 #22
Quite easily? gyroscope Sep 2018 #23
For various values of "prove" zipplewrath Oct 2018 #24
wow. ucrdem Dec 2018 #25
I wish that there would be thorough studies of the Pachamama Dec 2018 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Can the official theory o...»Reply #5