It is this simple regarding 9/11...NO ONE has ever came forward and said 'I was part of it!"....

[eomer]

15. OK, so there are some specific scenarios that you think would require hundreds.

And you think those scenarios therefore are unlikely because with hundreds involved you think something would have leaked out.

I'm with you on some of that. I also think that scenarios involving a large number of people being in on the whole plot are unlikely because something would have leaked out.

But I think there are lots of scenarios that involve either a smaller total number of people involved or else a small number of people who knew the true plot combined with a larger number of people who played unwitting roles - who did some part but didn't know why they did it.

For example, creating a diversionary apparatus in the form of training exercises would have involved a large number of people but very few of them would have needed to know the true reason for it. A small number of people at the top could have manipulated the timing and synchronicity of the exercises while all the rest of the actors carried them out unwittingly, thinking they were routine operations.

There are lots of variations on this theme and I think lots of them could have been accomplished with only a small cadre of people who knew the true plan.