Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

BeFree

(23,843 posts)

18. Right

Reply to Bolo Boffin (Reply #17)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 08:09 PM

Dec 2011

They didn't deliver eveidence an attack was imminent. But... if the policy had been in place to gather up the intelligence from the field, they would have been the first to alert the country. What they were best at was hiding stuff. Like the WMD, the stolen elections, clear skies. Oh wait, that's not speculation.

I speculate that I may be in the wrong group here.... I need to speculate more..... here we go..... bushco is innocent when it comes to 9/11. How's that for speculating? Is buscho is innocent of 9/11, speculation?

What do you speculate?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Creative Speculation? [View all] BeFree Dec 2011 OP

What is Bushco? zappaman Dec 2011 #1

Just for you, zzzzzzzzzzzzzz BeFree Dec 2011 #2

I don't believe George Bush or the members of his administration were zappaman Dec 2011 #5

How would one prove that, one way or an other? I think Bush/Cheney were aware teddy51 Dec 2011 #7

Well lets see, Bush received a document titled 'Bin-Laden Determined to Strike the U.S'... FarLeftFist Dec 2011 #9

I don't believe George Bush or the members of his administration were zappaman Dec 2011 #10

Can't say if I do or don't because I've never been convinced either way, but... FarLeftFist Dec 2011 #11

I say Bush/Cheney and the neocon's had 911 planned long before Bush stole teddy51 Dec 2011 #13

Did nothing? Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #12

First you'll have to believe that piece of info, Second... FarLeftFist Dec 2011 #14

"It clearly states numerous times that they were planning to HIJACK airplanes..." It says nothing Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #15

Now that WAS Creative, bolo BeFree Dec 2011 #16

"had pretty good proof that the hijackings were about to take place" Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #17

Right BeFree Dec 2011 #18

The lack of evidence supporting your assertion is there for everyone to see. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #19

Bushco is innocent BeFree Dec 2011 #20

What does "Bushco is innocent" mean? zappaman Dec 2011 #23

What is Bushco? zappaman Dec 2011 #21

read bolo's stuff BeFree Dec 2011 #22

I did read Bolo. zappaman Dec 2011 #24

bushco is not innocent BeFree Dec 2011 #25

"bushco is NOT innocent when it comes to 9/11." zappaman Dec 2011 #28

I have to say something here Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #26

Really? zappaman Dec 2011 #27

Concern? Grateful for Hope Jan 2012 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author Grateful for Hope Jan 2012 #30

I tend to agree with you. LanternWaste Mar 2012 #32

Disagree William Seger Mar 2012 #33

Especially when a sentence has absolutely no meaning at all. zappaman Mar 2012 #34

on what getdown Dec 2011 #3

And....... BeFree Dec 2011 #4

What? zappaman Dec 2011 #6

Not sure what to think. Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #8

Unfortunately we are left to speculate felix_numinous Jan 2012 #31