Creative Speculation

Bolo Boffin

(23,872 posts)

26. It doesn't mention a lot of Al Qaeda attacks.

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 06:43 PM

Jan 2012

It does mention the one they had indicted him for. That indictment had happened before the 9/11 attacks and it was sufficient to arrest or request extradition for bin Laden. Since they already had the power to arrest him, they didn't need to waste time updating a poster when they could be doing other work trying to catch him.

Which Al Qaeda attacks, small or large, involved airplanes, gyroscope? A lot? Or just one?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Counterterrorism Czar Accuses Tenet and CIA of 9/11 Cover-Up [View all] gyroscope Jan 2012 OP

The information was shared with the FBI noise Jan 2012 #1

Not according to Clarke gyroscope Jan 2012 #2

So, now you believe... William Seger Jan 2012 #3

I dont know if you could call them hijackers gyroscope Jan 2012 #4

That link to the FBI Most Wanted Page for bin Laden: could you tell me what this means? Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #5

You would have to ask those organzations gyroscope Jan 2012 #7

"the FBI says..." OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #6

The poster makes specific mention gyroscope Jan 2012 #8

that's irrelevant to what you claimed OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #12

"Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world." Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #13

That would be in reference to other smaller attacks gyroscope Jan 2012 #17

So the USS Cole attack is not a significant attack and did not involve American casualties? Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #18

That's not what I said gyroscope Jan 2012 #21

A United States battleship attacked in the Persian Gulf Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #23

Why do you think the FBI wanted poster fails to mention 9/11 at all? gyroscope Jan 2012 #24

It doesn't mention a lot of Al Qaeda attacks. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #26

Was bin Laden ever indicted for 9/11? gyroscope Jan 2012 #28

Your answer inside. Which Al Qaeda attacks, small or large, involved airplanes, gyroscope? Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #30

Did the FBI say that? gyroscope Jan 2012 #33

Your answer inside. You didn't answer mine. Which AQ attacks, small or great, involved airplanes? Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #41

I agree that gyroscope should step up and answer questions OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #46

Ah, yes, you've got it AND the quote I was looking for originally, the "for example" one. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #47

Why didn't the FBI indict bin laden? gyroscope Jan 2012 #56

I have answered that question already. You have not answered mine. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #58

Irrelevant to the discussion gyroscope Jan 2012 #64

I see. Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #67

and here's another question: why do you think you know this? OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #60

So there would be no confusion about who was responsible gyroscope Jan 2012 #65

in other words, you've got nothing OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #68

"a new independent investigation to answer" what question? William Seger Jan 2012 #9

I doubt the official story gyroscope Jan 2012 #10

You think Clarke doubts ... William Seger Jan 2012 #11

I don't presume to know what he thinks in that regard gyroscope Jan 2012 #14

Why is that an issue ... William Seger Jan 2012 #15

Who said they weren't? gyroscope Jan 2012 #16

You were... William Seger Jan 2012 #19

I never claimed no plane crashed into the Pentagon gyroscope Jan 2012 #22

your claim zappaman Jan 2012 #25

What part do you not understand? gyroscope Jan 2012 #27

so you have no idea what struck the pentagon? zappaman Jan 2012 #29

do you not consider this clear evidence? zappaman Jan 2012 #31

From your link gyroscope Jan 2012 #32

We'd know it was AA77 ... William Seger Jan 2012 #34

How does Sunder know how large the explosions were? gyroscope Jan 2012 #37

His comment was based on how large the explosion would need to be William Seger Jan 2012 #40

You guys don't read the paper do you? gyroscope Jan 2012 #43

You are a prime example... William Seger Jan 2012 #44

"The explosions weren't loud enough" gyroscope Jan 2012 #48

which raises the question: where have you been? OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #49

Is there such a thing as a silent explosion? gyroscope Jan 2012 #50

why do you continue to misrepresent what we all can read? OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #51

According to Sunder gyroscope Jan 2012 #52

Is English not your primary language? zappaman Jan 2012 #53

Sunder is a clown who belongs in a circus act. gyroscope Jan 2012 #54

No difficluties with English here. zappaman Jan 2012 #55

Comedy gold gyroscope Jan 2012 #57

"according to Sunder, the explosions were silent which is why no one could hear them on 9/11." zappaman Jan 2012 #59

speaking of which OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #61

good point on how the "discussion" started zappaman Jan 2012 #62

So what is Sunder saying? gyroscope Jan 2012 #63

can you show us what you don't understand? OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #66

"some witnesses say it was a large airliner" zappaman Jan 2012 #36

You did claim it couldn't be AA77 William Seger Jan 2012 #35

Where did I say that? gyroscope Jan 2012 #38

"But a look at the flight data recorder information provided by the NTSB..." William Seger Jan 2012 #39

Again gyroscope Jan 2012 #42

Clearly, that is NOT "simply" what you did in the quotes I posted William Seger Jan 2012 #45

I thought that Clarke was notified Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2012 #20