Counterterrorism Czar Accuses Tenet and CIA of 9/11 Cover-Up

[gyroscope]

32. From your link

some witnesses say it was a large airliner, others say it was a small aircraft or commuter aircraft.
so which is it? other witnesses at the scene mention the lack of debris, which also indicates it could have been a smaller aircraft. this is why a thorough investigation is needed to straighten things out.

the majority of witnesses do however indicate a large airliner, and that's fine if that's what it turns out to be. but if you're going to rely on witnesses then you can't choose to hold up the ones who support your story while ignoring for example hundreds of others at the World Trade Center who say they heard or witnessed explosions at the WTC.

which is exactly what the 9/11 commission did. they simply ignored the witnesses. the lead investigator for NIST has the audacity to claim there were no witnesses to any explosions at the WTC at all when in fact there are hundreds. this guy is a bald-faced liar and is a prime example of why the official story has no credibility whatsoever.