Counterterrorism Czar Accuses Tenet and CIA of 9/11 Cover-Up

[William Seger]

44. You are a prime example...

Last edited Fri Jan 20, 2012, 04:08 AM - Edit history (1)

... of why "truther" should always be put in quotes. As was JUST pointed out to you, Sunder did not say there were "no explosions."

Here's what you said about Sunder:

> the lead investigator for NIST has the audacity to claim there were no witnesses to any explosions at the WTC at all when in fact there are hundreds. this guy is a bald-faced liar and is a prime example of why the official story has no credibility whatsoever.


Here is what Sunder actually said, talking about WTC7:

"... and our analyses show that even with the smallest explosive charge that was capable of bringing down the critical column in the building, had it occurred, we would have seen sound levels of 120 to 130 decibels about a half a mile away. That would have been an incredibly loud sound, and that sound was not picked up by any of the videos or witnesses that we have talked to."

And then you attempt to defend your dishonest "bald-faced liar" accusation by pasting statements from a bunch of people of who heard all sorts of "explosions" in the towers? Really?

EDIT: The video I linked to is another prime example of why "truther" should always be put in quotes: It attempts to refute what Sunder said with one video that has a rumbling sound that doesn't sound anything like shaped demolition charges (and with no indication of why we should think that's WTC7 collapsing anyway), and another video which (as we discussed elsewhere) was shot around 10:30 in the morning (and has a dubious sound track anyway).