Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Counterterrorism Czar Accuses Tenet and CIA of 9/11 Cover-Up [View all]OnTheOtherHand
(7,621 posts)49. which raises the question: where have you been?
Sunder didn't just say "the explosions weren't loud enough." He made a specific, quantitative argument about how loud the explosions should have been.
You could have engaged that argument, but instead you misrepresented it as a completely different argument -- and called him a "bald-faced liar" based on your misrepresentation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That link to the FBI Most Wanted Page for bin Laden: could you tell me what this means?
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#5
So the USS Cole attack is not a significant attack and did not involve American casualties?
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#18
Your answer inside. Which Al Qaeda attacks, small or large, involved airplanes, gyroscope?
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#30
Your answer inside. You didn't answer mine. Which AQ attacks, small or great, involved airplanes?
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#41
Ah, yes, you've got it AND the quote I was looking for originally, the "for example" one.
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#47
"according to Sunder, the explosions were silent which is why no one could hear them on 9/11."
zappaman
Jan 2012
#59
"But a look at the flight data recorder information provided by the NTSB..."
William Seger
Jan 2012
#39