Here is the problem with the 911 conspiracy theory's......

[zeemike]

76. Well let me try again to explain.

The gif uses two frames from the Zapruder film...presumably 312 and 313...he alleged that the head moved from one frame to the other due to the impact of the bullet....so the bullet must have made impact on 312 tp do that...there is no evidence for that....And if it did not then the head moving forward was not from the bullet...and even if you did assume that it did then it would mean it took 1/18 of a second to traverse through the scull....which is a very long time for a bullet traveling at 2500 fps.
So what we are seeing is frame 313 showing the impact of the bullet...actually the bullet struck maybe 1/100 of a second before the exposure and that is why you see the cloud of material near the head....so any movement of the head caused by the impact would be shown only after 313.

But how can you say I did not refute Seger's claim....I just did it again and you will need to show me the math that refutes what I said....show me for instance a bullet traveling at 2500fps takes 1/18 of a second to traverse the scull for instance...which is the time between the two frames.

But I do care...and that is why I insist on real and substantial evidence to prove the lone assassin theory...and there is only this kind of evidence....Chery picked few frames that say proves when in reality it don't add up...not mathematically or in any other way.