Here is the problem with the 911 conspiracy theory's......

[OnTheOtherHand]

77. OK, let's think about this

he alleged that the head moved from one frame to the other due to the impact of the bullet....so the bullet must have made impact on 312 tp do that

on 312? What would that mean? If a frame captures an instant in time, then it would hardly be possible for the bullet to impact on a frame. It would impact between frames -- possibly much closer to the preceding frame than to the following frame, but not "on" either one.

That's the logical meaning of your own previous statement about frames 312 and 313, isn't it? You think you figured this out but Seger didn't? or what?

And here you're saying the same thing: that the bullet struck between frames 312 and 313, "maybe 1/100 of a second before the exposure" of 313. How on earth do you figure that there is enough time (whether "1/100 of a second" or whatever it might be) to produce a "cloud of material near the head" but not enough time to make the head itself move? What kind of physics is that? If you don't agree with Seger that the momentum transfer would be instantaneous, what is your reason?

But how can you say I did not refute Seger's claim....I just did it again and you will need to show me the math that refutes what I said....show me for instance a bullet traveling at 2500fps takes 1/18 of a second to traverse the scull for instance...which is the time between the two frames.

Who said that the bullet took 1/18 of a second to traverse the skull? That's a straw man.

But I do care...and that is why I insist on real and substantial evidence to prove the lone assassin theory...

Back here in real life, you didn't "insist on real and substantial evidence to prove the lone assassin theory" -- you said, in effect, that anyone who doesn't see what you think you see in the video is gutless. If you want to walk it back, that would be welcome, but I'm not just going to forget.