Here is the problem with the 911 conspiracy theory's......

[zeemike]

121. I get what you are claiming.

But that don't make it right. Even if you lower the numbers it don't make sense because even if your time line is right the rest is still unexplainable....for instance what would be the delay in head movement caused by inertia?....and why did the head not continue forward after 313?
And back to the movement you say is there...I looked closely at 312 and 313 blown up and all and noticed that what you used as reference points are elongated in 313....look at Jackie's arm on the back of the seat behind his head...it gets longer in 313 and so does the head of the driver and that little white thing on the door...why is that?....and is that distortion what you are saying is movement of the head?
I spent a little time on those two frames and I can see no difference in relationship between Jackie head and his in the....but the difference in the size of say Connelly's head due to the distortion is just the same as you say the head moved...
Another point the pattern of the cloud of debris is consistent with a frontal shot...not as it would be if the bullet came out of the head.

Buy look this is hopeless because you only want to believe your evidence and don't care at all to consider mine....and that is fine...believe what you will....and if you want to consider it debunked because you found some minuscule point that you can use that is fine too...but don't claim that anyone who doubts you is a fool or ignorant...that kind of intimidation don't work with me.
There is tones of evidence that says it was a conspiracy...including the house of representatives committee that investigated it....but if you want to believe it is debunked because you measured movement...or distortion like I think, then no one can change that