Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: OK then. Just the facts. 9-11 [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)36. "2. Timing does show some free fall throughout collapse of towers."
Then why did you post a link to that awful publication by Chandler, in which his own data shows the acceleration to be much less than -9.8 m/s^2.
Or does the fact that your own source contradict your own statement not bother you?
Chandler claims it was -6.4 m/s^2.
Can you explain why you cite an article in this thread that contradicts one of your own premises?
Or are you really too ignorant to notice?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"... is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared."
William Seger
Feb 2012
#26
For someone who claims to be curious, why have you not read any critical analysis of this POS?
jberryhill
Feb 2012
#35