OK then. Just the facts. 9-11

[cbrer]

79. I was hoping

That our "resident" physicists and engineers would chime in more, and that motive, and suspects could be more clearly considered in an independent thread. But that's the way this cookie usually crumbles. The 2 are aspects of the same events, and share scientific considerations. There are thousands of analyses, as well as tens of millions of words on those events. It's damned hard for someone with my upper math/physics/engineering background (practically nil) to understand the formulae and conclusions. Not that those are the definitive answer to all the questions that arise, but if one doesn't understand the answers, how is one to eliminate false ones? So I try to keep an open mind, and create threads that explore the possibilities.