911: Window of Exposure

[. .]

57. Further notes...

It should be said, a clear goal for the aftermath was to attack privacy rights, and to recondition our views about such rights, in order to dissolve perceived resistance points within an emerging digital technology. The least of these perceived concerns undoubtedly were not financial.

Once again, for the action itself, the goal was to realize a maximum probability to successfully administer death, combined with a minimum probability for outright exposure. A maximum chance to successfully administer death was a preface to maximum legal response (loss of rights), while minimal probability for outright exposure played an even greater role: a backfire with such a plot would not only work against the intended new environment, by placing widespread focus upon political corruption (imagine that), but it would also likely remove the chance to legally destroy rights for generations to come.

So "success" is defined as a balance between these two factors, with failure being an effective end and reversal to such subversion.

The greatest probability for such success--using both descriptors, jointly or separately--could not be realized without the containment of the National Command Authority.