Osama Confession Video

[The Doctor.]

45. Here in reality, people are indicted, tried, and convicted on the strength

of video and/or audio admissions of crimes.

This is really all I need to hear from you to know that when it comes to the OV, you'll disregard inconvenient reality. You've chosen such a ludicrous position that it's just not worth going any farther.

Those who live in reality can by now see very clearly that you are willing to both call the video a 'confession', but then turn around and make the, frankly insane, assertion that a video confession does not constitute 'hard evidence'.

Essentially, you want to have your cake and eat it too. You want the video to 'prove' bin Laden's involvement without it having to be proof.

You may not realize how completely preposterous your position is, but I'm glad to have a thread that demonstrates how the OV adherents will choose to ignore reality in order to protect their faith in the Bush Administration's story.

My logic sits on the very sound fact that video confessions are considered 'hard evidence'. I can't expect to get through a mind so twisted as to believe we have indicted, prosecuted, and jailed so many thousands of people without any hard evidence of their guilt because only video/audio of their crime or confession was in evidence.

Oh, and since you don't speak Arabic, how do you know it is a confession?