Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Dallas Morning News: Gary Mack and the evolution of a JFK conspiracy theorist [View all]William Seger
(11,040 posts)... except the humorous comment. The story about what Stone had to do to film the scene (due to the fact that modern gunpowder only produces a small amount of gray smoke that dissipates in less than a second) doesn't come from McAdams. It comes from a witness to the filming, Gus Russo: http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100smoke.html
And, BTW, the hatred that conspiracists have for McAdams, Bugliosi, Posner and anyone else who calls bullshit on JFK conspiracists simply reinforces how little they care about getting at the truth. The one and only thing they seem to care about is how many people can be recruited into the cult. As one of their victims, your opinion about what constitutes a "reputable researcher" is pretty laughable. The guys you idolize can't even muster enough evidence to convince each other what happened, but so what, as long as it's not the "official story," huh.
And I'm sorry, but you failed to post enough ROFLs to make the convincing case that all those people are running toward an armed man who just murdered someone. What do you imagine they intended to do? Get the man to empty his weapon on them and then whoever was left would grab him? It's never ceases to amaze me what conspiracists can convince themselves of when they are trying to rationalize their inherently irrational beliefs.