Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 32 Reasons and Arguments There Was No Conspiracy Behind Oswald Killing Kennedy [View all]Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)26. (22) Oswald would not have done anything to draw attention to himself before the hit.
If he were part of a conspiracy, that is. Why would an hired assassin court any attention, particularly that of the FBI?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
32 Reasons and Arguments There Was No Conspiracy Behind Oswald Killing Kennedy [View all]
Bolo Boffin
Mar 2013
OP
(1) There is no credible evidence, direct or circumstantial, that any suspected group actually did.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#1
(2) Any entertainment of a conspiracy by them would have been "reckless, irrational, and dangerous."
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#2
(3) Since there's no credible evidence against the "usual suspects," who else?
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#3
(5) The complexity of any proposed JFK assassination conspiracy argues against it working.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#5
(6) If Oswald was part of a conspiracy, they waited a long time to bring him aboard.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#6
(7) Oswald's conduct in the month before the assassination (until Nov 19) precludes a conspiracy.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#7
(9) Oswald wasn't the kind of person anyone would hire to be the point person.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#9
(10) Oswald wasn't the kind of person who would work with or for a conspiracy.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#10
(11) Those who then knew Oswald and Ruby rejected the idea either acted in concert with others.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#11
(12) The Warren Commission's conclusions were supported by JFK's brothers and son.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#12
(13) Oswald never showed any evidence of having a mysterious source of money.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#13
(15) No group would have let Oswald use a rifle so easily traceable to him.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#15
(17) The use of a military rifle that could not use soft-point bullets argues against conspiracy.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#17
(18) Conspirators would not have chosen someone with Oswald's shooting expertise.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#18
(19) Oswald had no track record as a hit man with any suspected organization.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#19
(21) Oswald's desire to blow up the Dallas FBI office argues against conspiracy.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#25
(22) Oswald would not have done anything to draw attention to himself before the hit.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#26
(23) Oswald's many applications for employment in October preclude a conspiracy.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2013
#27
(27) Oswald's extreme isolation in the weeks before the assassination argue against conspiracy.
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#31
(28) A conspiracy would have made sure Oswald was unavailable for any interrogation.
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#32
(29) Oswald not bringing his revolver to work on Thursday is evidence of his acting alone.
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#33
(30) Oswald never offering to turn state's evidence supports no conspiracy.
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#34
(31) Almost all of the "usual suspects" would have to have enlisted the others.
Bolo Boffin
May 2013
#35
the evidence is that he can't see one of the most obvious conspiracies and
NoMoreWarNow
May 2013
#44
Thanks, but that testimony has more holes in it than a spaghetti strainer, and it's full of
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2013
#67
Ok, I've read some of the "53 Reasons" post, but I still have to say it's full of holes....
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2013
#69