Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,049 posts)
13. Well, "obviously," whoever planted the part
Mon Apr 29, 2013, 11:45 AM
Apr 2013

... didn't want to damage it -- that would completely ruin the story that it had been ejected from a 530mph crash, tossed 2 blocks and dropped 800 feet -- so instead of just dropping it from the roof they carefully lowered it on that rope. Then instead of going into the alley to remove the rope, they just dropped it and hoped nobody would notice. But you're too sharp for them, huh.

Or maybe someone found the part and tied the rope to it to try to drag it out of there, but gave up.

Or maybe the rope really is an unrelated coincidence.

Or... whatever, you're being asked why you said it was "obviously" planted, and all you've got for an answer is the logical fallacy known as begging the question.

> I know your modus operandi. It's childish, illogic... won't even bother going there.

My modus operandi is to challenge conspiracy bullshit with facts and reason. If it's not bullshit, then respond with facts and reason. If that's " childish, illogic" to you, that would explain a lot.

> You simply disregard and deny anything that doesn't fit your convictions.

Bullshit. Anyone who actually reads this board should know that I give very specific reasons for everything I challenge, and I put a lot of time into explaining it as clearly as I can. You are the one in denial.

No. Not weird at all. ocpagu Apr 2013 #1
That makes as much sense as everything else related to the "truth movement" William Seger Apr 2013 #3
My point... ocpagu Apr 2013 #6
Ah. William Seger Apr 2013 #7
Sigh... ocpagu Apr 2013 #8
I see... William Seger Apr 2013 #9
Of course you don't. ocpagu Apr 2013 #10
Not by coincidence, we've been discussing that nonsense here for years William Seger Apr 2013 #11
I won't even waste my time. ocpagu Apr 2013 #12
Well, "obviously," whoever planted the part William Seger Apr 2013 #13
What makes you think it's rope? AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #14
Or maybe... William Seger Apr 2013 #16
How is it "obvious" it was planted? zappaman Apr 2013 #17
How is it weird? cpwm17 Apr 2013 #2
it's a large part wedged in a weird spot and just found now? NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #4
related article here NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #5
For reference, here's where it was found William Seger Apr 2013 #15
the weird parts are NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #18
If "it was found in such a tight place" William Seger Apr 2013 #19
I think we can safely say the part didn't fall into that little gap originally NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #20
'I think we can safely say the part didn't fall into that little gap originally" zappaman Apr 2013 #21
What plane? Politicalboi May 2013 #22
Two things William Seger May 2013 #23
yes, I'm not really sure what happened NoMoreWarNow May 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Large 9/11 Plane Part Jus...»Reply #13