9/11 Debunked: "Molten Metal" Explained

[AtheistCrusader]

36. You don't even understand what I am saying.

"Not even 7 came down in its own footprint. If that was a CD, the owners of the surrounding buildings would have maxxed out their insurance in a heartbeat. NONE of the towers came down symmetrically."

You seem to have understood what I said here ok...

"The lean is fine. They bias an implosion in a controlled direction. Not so with the towers and building 7, all of which physically impacted other buildings."

You don't seem to know what I am saying here. I said the lean is fine, in reference to an ACUAL CD. They lean it on purpose. What they don't do, is lean it INTO OTHER BUILDINGS. 7 hit other buildings. Quite significantly so.

1&2 completely wrecked shit in all directions.

Even building 7 would be considered a complete and utter spectacular FAILURE of a CD by any actual CD firm. Ignoring of course, the actual facts of how the collapse unfolded, and the fire and building codes changed as a result, because you know people just LOVE doing all that work for shits and giggles.


"I don't think it would have been too hard to disguise the work of setting up the buildings for demolition. they could have done it under the guise of building renovations, asbestos removal since the towers were known to have an asbestos problem for example, under the guise of replacing and upgrading old wiring or whatever else they could think of. these kind of things are done on buildings all the time and no one would ever know the difference."

Great fucking Gnu, do you have any idea what you are saying? Do you know how much explosives it takes to pulverize just ONE out of 100x2 ACRES of concrete flooring? How many TONS PER FLOOR? You think they could just slap it on the beams under the guise of asbestos abatement? Well, ok, that totally explains how the floor BETWEEN the inner and outer core got pulverized then. Boy, you got me there.