Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
8. "Forensically proven to be wrong", by whom?
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 05:25 PM
Oct 2013


http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100sbth.html

The trajectory not only works, given the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally, the angle of Kennedy's back wound and the angle of exit at the throat and the reconstructed trajectory, any bullet exiting Kennedy's throat on that path would have HAD to have struck Connally. There is literally nowhere else for it to go. (And the wound in Connally's back was elliptical, not circular; it was caused by a bullet that was already tumbling.)

I don't see any "unscientific" here except from you; you make assertions that are easily refuted by evidence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Dictabelt Motorcycle Was ...»Reply #8