Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: The best evidence against a 9/11 conspiracy? [View all]Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)42. They seemed pretty competent to me.
Last edited Mon Oct 28, 2013, 12:05 PM - Edit history (1)
They managed to do two illegal wars, steal two elections, up the military and security budgets to benefit their friends, intimidate the media, geld the left, and cap it all off by demanding a $700 billion payoff for their bankster friends and ensuring that the succeeding administration would not only not prosecute, but not even investigate their crimes.
What's incompetent about that? Incompetence was an act that fits the neocon meme very well, and you fell for it. Every time those chardonnay-sipping volvo-driving liberal elitists sneered at "stupid" George Bush, it made the Red Staters identify with him all the more.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is evidence only that the powers that be have controlled information well enough . . .
freedom fighter jh
Sep 2012
#6
There's only one standard for what constitutes a "valid" logical inference
William Seger
Sep 2012
#17
But, of course, a valid logical inference is not the standard in a criminal case.
eomer
Sep 2012
#23