9/11 Free Fall 7/18/13: Dr. deHaven-Smith and "conspiracy theory"

[William Seger]

41. Confessions to third parties are not considered to be hearsay

Last edited Sun Nov 10, 2013, 11:59 AM - Edit history (2)

... and they are admissible as evidence, e.g. MacNeil's confession to an inmate in the trial that ended yesterday. As in that trial, such a confession would not be enough to convict KSM, but an honest person would admit that that isn't all the evidence against KSM. Abu Zubaydah had already named KSM as the 9/11 planner a few months before Fouda's interview (without waterboarding, btw), a fact unknown to Fouda at the time. His voluntary confession to the military tribunal may well exaggerate his involvement with 9/11 and a long list of other al Qaeda plots, but his involvement in 9/11 is also established by stuff found on his computer when he was captured and by eavesdropped telephone conversations.

Your unwillingness to accept any evidence discredits your opinions.

EDIT: I forgot to comment on your unwillingness to address OBL's confessions, although once again your only reason for dismissing them is personal incredulity.

2nd EDIT: I also forgot to mention some more evidence you'll be compelled to deny: Corroboration of Fouda's interview was posted on jehad.net by al Qaeda's "media office" on September 21, 2002.