Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Free Fall 7/18/13: Dr. deHaven-Smith and "conspiracy theory" [View all]Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 11, 2013, 04:03 PM - Edit history (3)
Anyone who can read a blueprint can see that.
My argument is simply to counter your untruthful statements, such as your claims in post 30 that the 9/11 attack plan was for a small bunch of small Muslims "not at all complicated" and "highly plausible", your claim that there was a "vulnerability" to an al Qaeda attack plan that had been known since 1995, and your claim that the idea that people could have done demolition preparations covertly was "absurd".
Let us establish the facts first, before we go running around creating hand-waving theories (like yours).
Your inability to distinguish between a slender and swaying "spire" and a robust, cross-braced structural core capable of holding up most of the weight of the 65 stories above it is a matter of persistent blindness. I didn't say "they" went to the trouble to bring down the core. I said its destruction has not been explained, and was even dodged by the NIST report. When did I call NIST liars?