Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: The Great Thermite Debate... [View all]Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)This is a pattern with you--being very loosey goosey about your specifications and putting a lot of energy
into red herrings.
There's nothing idiotic about the notion that the WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions.
Nobody said Dr. Romero's opinion or Mr. Hamburger's opinions were insane at the time--not even George Bush,
when he demanded no tolerance for "outrageous conspiracy theories" on November 10.
100% of the time before 9/11 when highrise buildings came down it was through controlled demolitions.
Never before 9/11 had a modern highrise building come down from fire.
100% of the time since 9/11 when highrise buildings came down it was through controlled demolitions.
Never since 9/11 has a modern highrise building come down from fire. We've had spectacular high-rise fires
in Grozny, Moscow, Dubai, Shanghai, and Beijing--and none of those buildings fell down.
Controlled demolition was feasible, and there was a strong motivation for it because the terrorizing effect
of the attacks depended on the complete destruction of the buildings.