Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Aircraft - Why Fly So Fast? [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)I am typing, not stammering, and your comments, a Gish Gallop, you have no clue what is in the video you support with Gish Gallop nonsense, PNAC BS.
You can't waste time to study 911, you know it was an inside job, you call 19 terrorists and four crashed aircraft a "911 fairy tale" too lazy to check the facts, you know it is a fairy tale because of some bias on PNAC, with the big army of one, Dick Cheney and his shotgun shooting big donators ...
Yep, 911 truth using their hearts, political bias and ignorance, they know the real event, what happened did not happen, but it was an inside job, and all of this BS 911 truth claims are based on, zero evidence. Why, questioning 911 boils down to ignorance, no knowledge of 911. Using their hearts, biases, when they need facts and evidence, and critical thinking skills.
Bush Sr, that is your evidence for what? Because you hate someone means 911 was an inside job - sounds like those who hate Clinton, making up people he killed, lies like 911 truth have; born in bias and hate - your are projecting.
You don't have to watch a video, so you have no clue it is filled with lies based on ignorance. You don't have the time to watch, so you support liars because it is their heart to lie, and make up delusional claims about 911 - you don't have time to watch, so you think spreading lies is okay, the right thing to do. Lie about the murder of thousands by 19 terrorists, you can't figure out who did 911, you blame PNAC.
You're stammering. I actually didn't watch the video and I'm uninterested. But I don't have an agenda like you do. You also know nothing about me or the people I work with.
You make up the fantasy "they" did 911, and don't have time to watch the video of lies, which supports your fantasy; to study 911 evidence would ruin your PNAC fantasy of woo.
PNAC did not ask for a new Pearl Harbor, they said it would take an event like Pearl Harbor to change the military... but in reality, if you had been paying attention, the military has been trying to change since 1990 (big event back then) since the military realized the threat has changed. You turn PNAC in to some secret army, and make up fantasy you can't support.
Now you spread lies about PNAC, and a prewritten Patriot Act, spreading lies like the video you can't watch, or understand.
I fly jets, and like Condi, I never imagined idiots flying stolen jets into buildings; I guess conspiracy theorists like yourself image all sorts of stuff. Wait, you say aircraft did do it. OOPS, you debunked the video.
The video you can't afford to watch cause it might ruin your inside job fantasy says it can't be stock airliners, had to be modified or some other far out delusional fantasy. Yet you are ripping Condi for not expecting stolen airliners used to attack the USA. I assume you wrote a paper before 911 warning us of the danger of 19 terrorists and four aircraft. What, you did nothing, yet you are saying Condi should have, but you can't.
So you agree it was 4 stock 767/757 aircraft used by 19 terrorists, and you now endorse the official story, cause if you attack Condi for her statement, it means you support the official story of 19 terrorist and four aircraft. So you did imagine 19 terrorists cutting pilots throats and taking four commercial aircraft as weapons. Why did you fail to warn us? You have debunked the video.
Iraq had nothing to do with 911, except they (some of them) were happy it happened. Did Bush Jr fool you. I thought you did not trust Bush? I never liked Saddam, he was shooting at my fellow pilots, and he tried to kill me; so attacking him is something I would do for free. Yet you want Saddam back? He did not do 911. Why get all off topic.
The video you did not watch tries to say 767/757 can't fly as fast as they did, and offers zero evidence. Your weak attack on Condi kind of debunks the video. Since Condi is in on 911, it is silly to attack her statement, since you would be admitting it was 19 terrorists and four stock 757/767s, not some inside job you cooked up because you hate Bush Sr. Why don't all those who don't like Bush make up lies of an inside job like you have... all without any evidence, just made up silly claims about PNAC, and failure to comprehend what PNAC said. Why lie about Bush, when there is so much to not lie about.
911 is an event, one you don't have a clue what happened, and admit you have not time to learn. Your opinions are not much support for your inside job fantasy. Stammering, is that projection too
lol, what evidence was destroyed? You freely repeat the 911 truth slogans and claims and come up evidence free.
Does the heart stuff work for other events. If you team lost the Super Bowl, do you use your heart to lie and say they won? Is that 911 truth logic, or what