9/11 Theories: Expert vs. EXpert

[Richard Charnin]

11. No need for me to respond.

The 1643 architects and 14,000 other scientists, military and other professionals have done so already. They are the experts. I defer to them.

I am not an expert.
Are you?

Based on the videos, it is quite obvious to any observer that all three collapses were due to demolitions. We don't need professional architects, engineers, chemists or physicists to prove it. But they have. In spades.

So where are your experts?

DID THE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS WHO SUPPORT THE OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY FORM A COUNTER GROUP?

If you know of such a group, please inform us. Please don't cite NIST. And don't cite Popular Mechanics. either -NO PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICS ALLOWED.

After all these years, one would expect that a group of professional architects and engineers would be supporting the official story in an official, non-governmental statement debunking Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Then we could have an open scientific debate.

But apparently that is asking for too much. Professional skeptics could have attended the Toronto 9/11 Hearings and debated the experts. I'm sure they would have been welcome. But the videos would have gone viral. The skeptics would then be forced to explain why they failed so miserably in the court of public opinion.