Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Open Invitation to Publicly Debate "William Seger" regarding the work of P4T. [View all]William Seger
(11,047 posts)10. Cap'n Bob can't bring weapons to this venue
"Im prepared to plow down anyone that gets in my way of questioning my govt.. get it? ... People within our organization have sworn to defend the Constitution from ALL enemies.. foreign or domestic. We are prepared to give our lives for it. Are you prepared to give yours if you stand in our way?"
(A blast from the past, in another thread where Cap't Bob wanted my phone number so we could have a "formal debate." Which was the same thread he defended using the NTSB video with the misaligned Pentagon graphic to claim the "north of the Citgo" flight path, even though he knew the actual FDR data did not show that path. Which is the same thread that he posted the graphic with the rotated compass to "prove" that the plane still wouldn't have hit the light poles.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Open Invitation to Publicly Debate "William Seger" regarding the work of P4T. [View all]
johndoeX
Jun 2014
OP
Anytime you are ready.... let us know. We can set up a mutual venue agreed upon by you and me.
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#9
You can't explain "by an increase of 20 percent in equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number"
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#21
You and your crew have been losing public debates on dozens of websites for years,
greyl
Jun 2014
#36
Debate lost due to lack of physics at pilots for truth, and fake Vd definitions from journalist
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#44