Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,047 posts)
16. You could at least get the terminology right
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 08:13 PM
Jun 2014

The calculated stresses under the conditions of 25.305 are to be taken as limit loads.

I've posted the question on another engineering forum. You wanna put your imaginary $50 on the line?

This is the venue, go... superbeachnut Jun 2014 #1
Congratulations, Rob, you got one right! William Seger Jun 2014 #2
Thank you Seger! johndoeX Jun 2014 #3
why can't you debate here? because you are running away again superbeachnut Jun 2014 #6
What I've always wondered... William Seger Jun 2014 #7
that is funny superbeachnut Jun 2014 #8
Beachy screws the pooch again. johndoeX Jun 2014 #14
Case in point William Seger Jun 2014 #23
This is funny stuff superbeachnut Jun 2014 #30
no one takes YOU seriously William! n/t wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #4
(Sniff) Would it help... William Seger Jun 2014 #5
sniff... wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #11
Anytime you are ready.... let us know. We can set up a mutual venue agreed upon by you and me. superbeachnut Jun 2014 #9
Cap'n Bob can't bring weapons to this venue William Seger Jun 2014 #10
Jackpot! johndoeX Jun 2014 #12
Debate time, where is johndoeX when the debate is on superbeachnut Jun 2014 #13
Beachy - do you agree with Seger or not? johndoeX Jun 2014 #15
You could at least get the terminology right William Seger Jun 2014 #16
link? johndoeX Jun 2014 #17
Is that a "no"? William Seger Jun 2014 #18
Yes johndoeX Jun 2014 #19
Aw, c'mon, it's only 50 imaginary bucks William Seger Jun 2014 #22
Wrong again Seger... johndoeX Jun 2014 #26
You are not current, you can't instuct in flight now superbeachnut Jun 2014 #29
Drop by this other forum, too William Seger Jun 2014 #32
Two days and no reply, why am I not surprised. johndoeX Jun 2014 #33
Vd is defined as? superbeachnut Jun 2014 #34
I thought you already knew the definition of Vd..... johndoeX Jun 2014 #35
You can't explain "by an increase of 20 percent in equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number" superbeachnut Jun 2014 #21
Stop evading Beachy... johndoeX Jun 2014 #27
Why can't you explain it? 7th time, you can't make a point superbeachnut Jun 2014 #28
Debate time superbeachnut Jun 2014 #20
Too bad Phillip Marshall isn't around to tell us nationalize the fed Jun 2014 #24
a paranoid conspiracy theorist kills himself and his kids superbeachnut Jun 2014 #25
"...absolutely no experience in Aviation nor Engineering. " delphi72 Jun 2014 #31
You and your crew have been losing public debates on dozens of websites for years, greyl Jun 2014 #36
And yet.... johndoeX Jun 2014 #37
lots of people lose public debates all the time.... wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #38
The most hilarious part is.... johndoeX Jun 2014 #39
yeppers! wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #40
Thank YOU! wildbillin'..... n/t johndoeX Jun 2014 #43
Debate is off, pilots for truth show their paranoid side superbeachnut Jun 2014 #41
Beachy, it has been debated long ago and put to bed. johndoeX Jun 2014 #42
Debate lost due to lack of physics at pilots for truth, and fake Vd definitions from journalist superbeachnut Jun 2014 #44
Post it again Beachy! johndoeX Jun 2014 #45
Last time he was asked to debate, he got upset superbeachnut Jun 2014 #46
Hmmm.. do you believe everything you read on the net? johndoeX Jun 2014 #48
Beachy, at what altitude what this pic taken? johndoeX Jun 2014 #47
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Open Invitation to Public...»Reply #16