Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Skygate 911 [View all]delphi72
(74 posts)Why would that matter at all with regards to the questions I or anyone else asks? If you can't answer them, just say so. Its not like you haven't been wrong before. You have actually been wrong on many issues before.
Besides, what sort of arrogance is it when you demand someone's name and photo and "experience in aviation" before you answer a question?
2 simple questions.
Where is the max speed of a 767 at 700 feet being 250 mph on your speed diagram? You agree with Leslie Hazzard, the PR lady/phone answerer/sometimes-aeronautical engineer with a BA in journalism and a minor in political science from Western Washington University when she agrees with Jeff Hill that the max speed of a 767 at 700 feet is 250 miles per hour. Where does that fall on your chart?
Your made-up chart has no business being used for anything since Boeing has not endorsed, backed, recognized, supported, verified, certified, signed off on or agreed to your chart. No court in this land would allow that as any sort of evidence of your claims. Why do you use it unless your goal is to fool people into believing it is the actual Boeing diagram supporting what you claim?
Simple questions. If you cannot answer them, no problem. I'll just make sure everywhere you post (where you haven't been banned) knows that a) you cannot answer those questions and b) you cannot answer any questions without someone's name, photo and some sort of "experience in aviation".