Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Open Invitation to Publicly Debate "William Seger" regarding the work of P4T. [View all]johndoeX
(268 posts)48. Hmmm.. do you believe everything you read on the net?
Apparently you believe a NYC Tour Guide?
Really?
Now show us where I actually said those words....
Beachy.. .do you also believe that I am an "ex-commercial pilot" as stated in your source?
Do you feel that the Commercial Pilot certificate expires?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Open Invitation to Publicly Debate "William Seger" regarding the work of P4T. [View all]
johndoeX
Jun 2014
OP
Anytime you are ready.... let us know. We can set up a mutual venue agreed upon by you and me.
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#9
You can't explain "by an increase of 20 percent in equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number"
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#21
You and your crew have been losing public debates on dozens of websites for years,
greyl
Jun 2014
#36
Debate lost due to lack of physics at pilots for truth, and fake Vd definitions from journalist
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#44