Skygate 911

[superbeachnut]

176. pilots for truth can't defend impossible speed lie, no support from rational Aero Engineers

You have no clue what you are talking about. Since you can't support the impossible speed lie, a weak attack on Seger follows. You have no Aero Engineer support which is evident by your fake Vg diagram, 11.2g failed physics, and the fake Vd definition you cherry picked from a journalist. You can't define Vd properly, let alone explain what Seger did past this weak attack.

Where are you Aero Engineers, you avoid debate by making up fake stuff like "support" for Seger. You can't explain getting 34g for a 2.4g reality. How did you get over 30gs off? Did you make it up, and lie? Why?

It seems your post of "does Seger have support" is a smoke screen for pilots for truth false claims.

Vd for an aircraft which is changing altitude and speed - johndoeX

Why can't your experts explain this? Never will, you will attack Seger with undefined nonsense.

"equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number and constant altitude" - johndoeX

You keep posting this as support for some failed claim, but you can't explain it - you must have zero Aero Engineers, they failed to get the g force right, and can't even coach you on a valid Vd definition.

"equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number and constant altitude" - johndoeX

What was the point, super 11.2g instructor for pilots for truth, without an ATP? What was your point? From your responses it is clear you have no clue what you are talking about. You can't explain how this relates to your lie of impossible speed. When will you explain this to me a simple Command Pilot from the USAF, and why did the USAF turn you down?