Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: Face with a name [View all]

superbeachnut

(381 posts)
7. pilots for truth faces to go with the fringe conspiracy theorists spreading lies of impossible speed
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:15 PM
Jun 2014
Now we know what 11.2g failed physics creators look like.

Now we know what pilots look like, who brag they can't hit targets hit by terrorist pilots. Failed in the safety of simulators; brag about being poorer pilots than terrorists. Pilots who spread lies, look like those faces.
Why would pilots brag about being unable to hit targets? Unable to fly as good as terrorists, and spreading lies of impossible speed.



Now we have faces to put with pilots who quotemine fake Vd definitions from journalists because they don't do aero.


Now we know the faces which fake Vg diagrams.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=188863


Pilots for truth experts give us 11.2g failed physics.
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/ephemera/sept11/balsamo/balsamo2.html
After the 11.2g failure, pilots for truth came up with 34g as the new Flight 77 requirement, yet Hani did it with less than 2.5g. Hani beats the faces above in flying; the pilots for truth claim they need practice to crash into the Pentagon.


Those faces are challenged pilots, they can't hit the Pentagon, and they say this was 34g for flight 77 to hit the Pentagon. Faces of paranoid conspiracy theorists. Like the pilot from Jet Blue who went nuts, these guys believe false claims and paranoid conspiracy theories about 911. Now we know what paranoia and apologizers for 911 terrorists look like.


http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/425355-757-767-v-g-diagram.html
johndoeX banned from other forums for spreading lies, SPAMming 911 lies.

oh noes, every edit is seen? oh noes

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Face with a name [View all] johndoeX Jun 2014 OP
What are these pilots claiming? Does being a pilot make their claims credible? arcane1 Jun 2014 #1
"I gave him nothing of the sort" (credibility) johndoeX Jun 2014 #2
I haven't made any claims, and you misquoted me without answering me. arcane1 Jun 2014 #3
Translation - johndoeX Jun 2014 #4
You are still avoiding my simple question: what are these pilots claiming? arcane1 Jun 2014 #5
You try to engage in a discussion with which you haven't read? johndoeX Jun 2014 #6
Nowhere in this thread did I state an opinion. Only a question. arcane1 Jun 2014 #9
Wrong arcane1 johndoeX Jun 2014 #10
yeppers! wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author superbeachnut Jun 2014 #12
pilots for truth faces to go with the fringe conspiracy theorists spreading lies of impossible speed superbeachnut Jun 2014 #7
In other words..... johndoeX Jun 2014 #8
Faces which spread lies about 911 - unable to hit targets terrorists hit - pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #11
Beachy, lets keep it simple.. shall we? johndoeX Jun 2014 #13
pilot for truth sources failed at physics, aero, and more superbeachnut Jun 2014 #14
Yawn... johndoeX Jun 2014 #15
Your 11.2g failed math is classic, never gets old, you still have it posted superbeachnut Jun 2014 #18
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #19
hmmmm.... wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #17
Faces don't help with knowledge, logic and physics superbeachnut Jun 2014 #20
Max Speed at 700' ? delphi72 Jun 2014 #21
Faces delphi72 Jun 2014 #22
faces that spread lies about the murder of thousands by 19 terrorists superbeachnut Jun 2014 #23
Jeff Latas analysis is based on failed knowledge superbeachnut Jun 2014 #24
Ross Aimer, what does he say about 911 superbeachnut Jun 2014 #25
FYI, it is not appropriate on DU to demand fellow members to reveal their real names and pictures. stevenleser Jun 2014 #26
Even if it was ok here... William Seger Jun 2014 #27
so why do you? wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #29
I use my real name because politics is my business and I want to encourage name recognition. stevenleser Jul 2014 #30
totally agree! n/t wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #31
faces talk, but offer no evidence, no proof, more woo superbeachnut Jul 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Face with a name»Reply #7