Creative Speculation

superbeachnut

(381 posts)

14. pilot for truth sources failed at physics, aero, and more

Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:24 PM

Jun 2014

Jeff Latas, Ross Aimer, Ralph “Rotten” Kolstad, Sinclair R Bruce Sinclair are your sources for the failed 11.2g physics?
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/ephemera/sept11/balsamo/balsamo2.html

Jeff Latas, Ross Aimer, Ralph “Rotten” Kolstad, Sinclair R Bruce Sinclair are your sources for the Fake Vg diagram?
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=188863
Are you saying your errors were made by your sources, these pilots who brag they need practice to hit targets the size terrorist pilots hit? 3 of the biggest buildings in the world?

http://www.cesura17.net/~will/ephemera/sept11/balsamo/balsamo2.html

Jeff Latas, Ross Aimer, Ralph “Rotten” Kolstad, Sinclair R Bruce Sinclair are your sources for the impossible speed, which is a lie?
Do they know Flight 11 hit at Vd? I suspect these pilot for truth sources failed to study 911 in any detail.
Where are your sources? Do they post here? Do they know their math has failed?

Did Jeff Latas, Ross Aimer, Ralph “Rotten” Kolstad, Sinclair R Bruce Sinclair and John Lear all check your 11.2g?

Why did you get banned here - http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/425355-757-767-v-g-diagram.html - twice - ?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Face with a name [View all] johndoeX Jun 2014 OP

What are these pilots claiming? Does being a pilot make their claims credible? arcane1 Jun 2014 #1

"I gave him nothing of the sort" (credibility) johndoeX Jun 2014 #2

I haven't made any claims, and you misquoted me without answering me. arcane1 Jun 2014 #3

Translation - johndoeX Jun 2014 #4

You are still avoiding my simple question: what are these pilots claiming? arcane1 Jun 2014 #5

You try to engage in a discussion with which you haven't read? johndoeX Jun 2014 #6

Nowhere in this thread did I state an opinion. Only a question. arcane1 Jun 2014 #9

Wrong arcane1 johndoeX Jun 2014 #10

yeppers! wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author superbeachnut Jun 2014 #12

pilots for truth faces to go with the fringe conspiracy theorists spreading lies of impossible speed superbeachnut Jun 2014 #7

In other words..... johndoeX Jun 2014 #8

Faces which spread lies about 911 - unable to hit targets terrorists hit - pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #11

Beachy, lets keep it simple.. shall we? johndoeX Jun 2014 #13

pilot for truth sources failed at physics, aero, and more superbeachnut Jun 2014 #14

Yawn... johndoeX Jun 2014 #15

Your 11.2g failed math is classic, never gets old, you still have it posted superbeachnut Jun 2014 #18

Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #19

hmmmm.... wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #17

Faces don't help with knowledge, logic and physics superbeachnut Jun 2014 #20

Max Speed at 700' ? delphi72 Jun 2014 #21

Faces delphi72 Jun 2014 #22

faces that spread lies about the murder of thousands by 19 terrorists superbeachnut Jun 2014 #23

Jeff Latas analysis is based on failed knowledge superbeachnut Jun 2014 #24

Ross Aimer, what does he say about 911 superbeachnut Jun 2014 #25

FYI, it is not appropriate on DU to demand fellow members to reveal their real names and pictures. stevenleser Jun 2014 #26

Even if it was ok here... William Seger Jun 2014 #27

so why do you? wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #29

I use my real name because politics is my business and I want to encourage name recognition. stevenleser Jul 2014 #30

totally agree! n/t wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #31

faces talk, but offer no evidence, no proof, more woo superbeachnut Jul 2014 #28