Balsamo Busted, again

[superbeachnut]

14. Yes, I agree, you have no idea what the point is

As seen on 911, Flight 175 got to 590 mph, and did not fall apart. RADAR and Video verify it was a stock 767. I agree, you Gish Gallop along, posting BS.

"Seger shot himself in the foot by posting the above VG.

In fact, the out-of-focus text in the Structural Failure zone (red zone) at the left and right arrows designating the "Overspeed Margin" is Vd.

The VG diagram he posted above is based on light aircraft, but basically has many of the same definitions as Jet aircraft, except Vno and Vne were removed from Jets in the 60's. Jets accelerate so fast that pilots were exceeding Vno on a regular basis. They were replaced with Vmo... but Vd is still the end of the flight envelope and the start of the structural failure zone for both types of aircraft.

VG diagrams expressing "Structural Failure" at Vne are used for inexperienced pilots as there is only a 10% margin between Vne and Vd. So basically, only 10-20 knots.

Do you think Seger will admit he is wrong?" - johndoeX

Why can't you source all of this? The Vmo/Vne were funny, as was the "structural failure" - and you have no idea how much irony is involved. Where did pilots for truth get "structural failure" at 425 KEAS.


A lie. Proved to be a lie by RADAR and Video. You got a source for your lie?

Your scale is bogus; pilot for truth Fake Vg diagrams start at over 90 knots, not zero knots. Fake Vg diagram - who made it? A failed photoshopped effort by pilots for truth.