Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

johndoeX

(268 posts)
5. Spin, obfuscate, deflect.
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:06 AM
Jun 2014

Are you good at anything else Seger?

If you notice, I was talking to a glider pilot on our forum. Yes, I did say that to keep it simple since a 10% margin between Vne and Vd on his glider is roughly 16 knots, and is why I posted the Vne VG diagram in the other thread demonstrating your epic failures, with further explanation in this post.

Now read this post....
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=22131&view=findpost&p=10810572

Furthermore, NewAgeMan is not me. But he did come to me for help. He is "EagleEye" at our forum. - Seger Fail

With that said, we both know the facts, and the fact is Vne is essentially 90% of Vd and Vd is the end of the flight envelope and the start of the structural failure zone for ALL aircraft. As Beachy was so nice to help out here....


(note the airspeeds, I removed them for my diagram, while using the definitions.. such as Vd being the end of the flight envelope and the start of the structural failure zone)

And another source -

"Many years ago, before oscilloscopes and sensitive vibration measuring devices were commonly used, aerodynamicists had a very basic means of identifying an airline's flutter speed. They'd find a skilled test pilot, show him a wheelbarrow full of money, then send him aloft to dive the airplane at dazzling airspeeds. The test pilot's job was to determine the speed at which the airplane experiences flutter.


When he returned-and when his breathing slowed and he regained his ability to speak-he'd tell his tale. He'd inform the engineers about the speed beyond which the airplane experienced flutter. This speed is known as Vd or design dive speed.

.......

That's why, in the spirit of safety, the FAR's require marking the airspeed indicator's red line (Vne - velocity to never exceed) at a point representing 90% of Vd."


But apparently you think Rod Machado is wrong, when I posted the above quote for you the last time you thought you knew about Vd.



Unfortunately for you, while posting the original VG from the Illustrated Guide to Aerodynamics, Beachy also throws you under the bus. See the words "Structural Failure" in the upper right? I suppose you think that is for aircraft only operating in that area of the graph? lol....

Vmo is the "limit case" in terms of speed on Transport aircraft, not Vd.

Now if you really wish to get even more technical. We know that a Boeing suffers structural failure at 154% based on static load testing. This is 4% above "Ultimate Case" (using your terms). If we apply the same factor to speed based on the Boeing 767 A1NM TCDS....



....we are looking at roughly 436 knots. 420(Vd)+4%

And precedent is in line with such a comparison.



Seger, when are you going to send your VG Diagram to the FAA telling them that the 'yellow' represents a "Factor of 1.5 for ALL the loads, not just g loads"?

Then again, would you have anything else to do after learning you were wrong from the FAA?

Keep spinning Seger... keep digging.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe Billy is SIGDEV nationalize the fed Jun 2014 #1
Cult-leader wannabes are usually paranoid delusional egoists (n/t) William Seger Jun 2014 #4
Pilots for truth can't source structural failure speed of a 767 - failure again superbeachnut Jun 2014 #2
Beachy - do you agree with this person? johndoeX Jun 2014 #9
Sorry, Cap't Bob, but I have an unimpeachable source. William Seger Jun 2014 #3
Spin, obfuscate, deflect. johndoeX Jun 2014 #5
ROFLMAO William Seger Jun 2014 #6
When are you going to email the FAA with your claims Seger? johndoeX Jun 2014 #7
I've noticed that most "truthers" are hypocrits William Seger Jun 2014 #8
The only thing you have proven.... johndoeX Jun 2014 #10
No, I don't, and having to repeat myself so many times is really annoying William Seger Jun 2014 #12
"Uh, no I shouldn't if he's wrong. And he is.".... johndoeX Jun 2014 #13
Is that a "never?" (n/t) William Seger Jun 2014 #15
quote mine, who cares what the real defintion is, pilots for truth can find a quote to say otherwise superbeachnut Jun 2014 #16
BTW, is "EagleEye" one of your socks on your own forum? William Seger Jun 2014 #11
No he isn't me. johndoeX Jun 2014 #14
LOL, I don't recall even thinking about you since your last disaster here William Seger Jun 2014 #17
Hmmm... johndoeX Jun 2014 #18
U mad, Bro? (n/t) William Seger Jun 2014 #19
Actually... johndoeX Jun 2014 #21
A more recent face with a name William Seger Jun 2014 #22
lol... nice johndoeX Jun 2014 #23
Thanks William Seger Jun 2014 #24
"Thanks for the bump"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #25
You do know that SOME people will read past the OP, right? William Seger Jun 2014 #26
Of course - johndoeX Jun 2014 #27
Oh, by now, I know who your target market is William Seger Jun 2014 #28
pilots for truth make personal attacks on those murdered on 911 by speading lies superbeachnut Jun 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»William Seger - Epically ...»Reply #5