Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Face with a name [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)28. faces talk, but offer no evidence, no proof, more woo
Bruce Sinclair, thinks he is a structural engineer, a fire science expert. Bruce Sinclair is a paranoid conspiracy theorist who flies planes.
Hope he does not rant about this claptrap in-flight.
http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/story/2012-03-27/JetBlue-captain-subdued-after-erratic-behavior-on-flight/53811070/1
Well, the one I use for people who are 9/11 neophytes or people who are disbelievers is -- The single most compelling piece of evidence is the collapse of Building 7 at the World Trade Center. - R. Bruce Sinclair
WTC 7 burned all day, no firefighting, and it collapsed. Not sure why he thinks WTC 7 is some smoking gun. Bruce is not a structural engineer, has no clue what fire can do; so he adopts fantasy from 911 truth nuts.
Most people don't even know that Building 7 collapsed because it's been expunged from the mainstream media completely. - R. Bruce Sinclair
Building collapse when on fire, and Bruce has to lie about WTC 7. A report was done on WTC 7, like other building totaled in fire. One Meridian Plaza, fire fought and the building totaled by fire. Windsor building, fire fought, building totaled by fire, and the steel frame section collapsed. oops, Bruce is fooled by the failed 911 truth movement of woo.
But the bottom line is that when a 47-story steel and concrete structure falls at 5:30 in the afternoon at 6 and a half seconds of free-fall speed into its own shadow - R. Bruce Sinclair
Bruce must be using that special 11.2g physics pilots for truth use.
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/Ephemera/Sept11/Balsamo/balsamo2.html
Bruce waves his hands (or googled 911 truth lies and believes them blindly) and says "free-fall"... oops physics again; WTC 7 took over 16 seconds to collapse, not 6.5 seconds. Bruce fails physics, which is standard for pilots for truth (see 11.2g physics).
Its "own shadow"? lol, wrong again Bruce Sinclair.
What is free-fall speed? 30mph, 100mph, what is it Bruce? This is funny, but then I am a geek, an engineer and a pilot; I took physics, not that I would not say "free-fall speed", but it is not a speed; Bruce has no clue what physics is, he is a 911 truth believer.
Bruce, WTC 7 was not a concrete building, it was steel frame. Sorry, but the new WTC 7 has concrete core to protect the stairs, etc. Bruce does not offer math, or engineering to go with his fantasy.
with video tapes of people saying "You'll have to get back. The building is coming down." - R. Bruce SinclairFire fighters have people move back, and some predict it might collapse, so they prepare and get people back. Wow, fire fighter doing their job. oops, Bruce seems to trying to hard to lie about 911.
This is the prima facie proof of an inside job. This building was hit by no airplane. ... - R. Bruce Sinclair
What a big leap of stupid. Bruce Sinclair, a failed pilot for truth believer thinks he can do engienering, and fails to present evidence. Doubt he knows what evidence is.
Where is Bruce Sinclair's supporting evidence for pilot for truth impossible speed, fake Vg diagram, or the 11.2g then 34g failed g force nonsense?
Same old 911 truth talk, no substance.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
pilots for truth faces to go with the fringe conspiracy theorists spreading lies of impossible speed
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#7
Faces which spread lies about 911 - unable to hit targets terrorists hit - pilots for truth
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#11
Your 11.2g failed math is classic, never gets old, you still have it posted
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#18
FYI, it is not appropriate on DU to demand fellow members to reveal their real names and pictures.
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#26
I use my real name because politics is my business and I want to encourage name recognition.
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#30