Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
Showing Original Post only (View all)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
61 replies, 21212 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I'm about to give some of these 9/11 truther dumb-asses a little bit of a lesson"
William Seger
Nov 2014
#4
" because walls are not built strong enough to bear the buildings above them at a crazy wrong angle"
wildbilln864
Jan 2015
#42
Exactly: the idea that WTC should topple over in one piece like a 2x4 is silly but ....
rewinn
Jan 2015
#52
No, as that paper explains repeatedly, calculations of the real life physical process were not done.
eomer
Nov 2014
#21