Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

(39,179 posts)

14. I thought you believed that there was no damage to WTC 7

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 06:15 AM

Mar 2015

I thought we were on different sides of the issue. Apparently that is not the case. Sorry for the confusion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

PART 2: Fictitious Gouge Launches Design Flaw Myth and Collapse Initiation Fantasy [View all] wildbilln864 Feb 2015 OP

So eyewitness accounts by the FDNY are fictitious? hack89 Feb 2015 #1

Accounts unsworn and untested in a court n/t frankfacts Feb 2015 #2

That doesn't make them fictitious. hack89 Feb 2015 #3

So present us your evidence so we can compare accounts hack89 Feb 2015 #5

Where's your evidence? frankfacts Mar 2015 #6

It is more than you have, isn't it? hack89 Mar 2015 #10

Now you're talking about something other than evidence n/t frankfacts Mar 2015 #11

So we both have no evidence? hack89 Mar 2015 #12

The "something" in my post title referred to the "it" in your post title frankfacts Mar 2015 #13

I thought you believed that there was no damage to WTC 7 hack89 Mar 2015 #14

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #15

WTC 7 Damage pic nationalize the fed Mar 2015 #16

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author frankfacts Mar 2015 #8